Ch Charts Summary

Behavior SWIS Data - Referral Counts

Discipline / Consequence Proportionality

View discipline data from various perspectives. 

Information may help districts monitor the effectiveness of behavioral systems and note trends in specific incidents or referrals.

Behavior / Chronic Absence

• Referral Counts
• Incident Counts
• Period Absence Counts

Monitor Annual Progress Charts 

• Average Discipline Incident 
• Percent With Zero Discipline
• Discipline Consequence Proportionality

Compare Annual Performance Charts 

• Average Discipline Incident Counts(Single Or Multiple Years)
• Percent With Zero Discipline (Single Or Multiple Years) 

Chronic Absenteeism - Absence / Attendance Counts

Monitor Progress of District - Attendance 90% or Better.

Comparing Performance of Gender, Race, Program, Student Groups - Attemdamce 90% or Better

Senior Drop Out /Graduate Percentage

Attendance / Course / Enrollment Proportionality

Activity Proportionality

Demographic  / Program Distributions

View attendance data reported through a variety of perspectives. For example, multiple chart views allow you to isolate and/or compare unexcused absence averages, tardy averages, and absence averages.

Multiple options for interval enrollment statuses allow for various purposes, including enrollment status, tracking student withdrawals, demographic criteria, and participation rates for programs, classes, and activities. 

This information is helpful for Federal and State reporting, Grants, effectiveness tracking, or visual comparative purposes. 

For Instance, 

• Students identified as Native American with any one of the Washington State Races selected and academically at risk may qualify for Title III Supplemental Instructional support.
• Percentage of students in a group being served by a program or activity
• Class enrollment

Chronic Absences

Chronic Absences - Elementary

Monitor Annual Progress Chart 

• Average Absence Counts
• Annual percentage with 90% Attendance
• Annual Percentage with 10% or More Absences
• Enrollment / Withdrawal
• Percentage Seniors Who Drop Out

Compare Annual Performance Chart 

• Average Absence Count (single or multiple years) 
• Percent with 90% Attendance (single or multiple years) 
• Percentage with 10% Absence
• Percentage of Attended Classes

• Percent of Seniors Who Drop Out (single or multiple years)
• Percent of Seniors Who Graduate (single or multiple years) 

View

• Enrollments/Withdrawals
• Achievement Gap 
• Participation Rates

• Federal Distribution
• Language Distribution
• Gender Distribution
• Program Distribution

Comparing Performance of Student Groups - Grade Distribution

Average Count of D and F Counts

Grades Proportionality

GPA Distribution

Senior Completion Distribution Levels

GPA for a particular student group by percent and count in a particular demographic, program

Current cumulative GPA

Credits Earned/Failed/Attempted

Accomplishment

Gradebook Grade Count / Assignment Count

CAA/CIA

• Met
• Graduation Year
• ELA, Reading, Writing, Math, EOC Math, Science Grad Req Met

Monitor Annual Progress Charts 

• Annual Average Counts of D's + F's
• Grade Distribution

Compare Annual Performance Charts

• Annual Average Counts of D's + F's (single or multiple years) 
• Grade Distribution (single or multiple years) 
• Current GPA Distribution
• Average Current GPA

View 

• Grade Distribution
• GPA Distribution
• Credit Distribution

Risk

Risk Indicator Value

Student Growth

Annual Performance Level % on Multiple Assessments

Annual Performance Level % on Multiple Assessments as a Cohort

Annual /Historical Percentage Meeting Standard

Assessment Proportionality

Monitor Annual Progress Chart 

• Performance Level Percentages
• Percentage Meeting Standard

Compare Annual Performance Charts

• Performance Level Percentages
• Percentage Meeting Standard

View

• Performance Level Percentages

Evaluation Performance Level Counts by Criterion

Evaluation Progress by Building

Evaluation Progress by Task Type

Display the counts of each performance level in each criterion, based on the selections made on: Task Template, Position Level (optional), School (optional), and School Year.

Evaluation Progress by Building

Evaluation Progress by Task Type

Some ideas on how a district might use this chart: 

• Calibration among principals of evidence they are looking for and how they are scoring each sub-criterion. (Example: If one building is getting many distinguished ratings in a particular area, work with them to help replicate it in other schools.) 
• To celebrate the staff's strengths and/or identify positive growth resulting from target PD. 
• Potentially identifying areas where we could focus on professional development, either due to lower or ‘inflated’ ratings in certain areas.